Earl v. State

179 So. 646, 28 Ala. App. 133, 1938 Ala. App. LEXIS 81
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 8, 1938
Docket8 Div. 599.
StatusPublished

This text of 179 So. 646 (Earl v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Earl v. State, 179 So. 646, 28 Ala. App. 133, 1938 Ala. App. LEXIS 81 (Ala. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

SAMFORD, Judge.

The appeal is on the record proper without bill of exceptions.

The indictment is in Code Form, and is in all things sufficient to charge the offense. Jinright v. State, 220 Ala. 268, 125 So. 606.

We have examined the record and find no error, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jinright v. State
125 So. 606 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
179 So. 646, 28 Ala. App. 133, 1938 Ala. App. LEXIS 81, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/earl-v-state-alactapp-1938.