Earl v. Decatur Public Schools Board of Education

2015 IL App (4th) 141111, 39 N.E.3d 1136
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedSeptember 18, 2015
Docket4-14-1111
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2015 IL App (4th) 141111 (Earl v. Decatur Public Schools Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Earl v. Decatur Public Schools Board of Education, 2015 IL App (4th) 141111, 39 N.E.3d 1136 (Ill. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

FILED 2015 IL App (4th) 141111 September 18, 2015 Carla Bender NO. 4-14-1111 th 4 District Appellate Court, IL IN THE APPELLATE COURT

OF ILLINOIS

FOURTH DISTRICT

SHARI L. EARL, as Parent and Guardian of ) Appeal from A.B., a Minor, ) Circuit Court of Plaintiff-Appellant, ) Macon County v. ) No. 14MR825 DECATUR PUBLIC SCHOOLS BOARD OF ) EDUCATION, a Body Politic and ) Honorable Corporation, ) Albert G. Webber, Defendant-Appellee. ) Judge Presiding.

JUSTICE KNECHT delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion. Presiding Justice Pope and Justice Turner concurred in the judgment and opinion.

OPINION

¶1 Plaintiff, Shari L. Earl, is the parent and guardian of a high school student, A.B.,

at MacArthur High School in Decatur, Illinois. She sought to enjoin defendant, Decatur Public

Schools Board of Education, from enforcing a policy requiring her child to complete six hours of

community service for each year of attendance in a Decatur public high school as a prerequisite

to graduation. Cross-motions for summary judgment (735 ILCS 5/2-1005 (West 2014)) were

filed and the trial court granted the motion for summary judgment filed by defendant. Plaintiff

appeals, arguing the School Code (Code) (105 ILCS 5/1-1 et seq. (West 2014)) specifically

provides the requirements which must be met for obtaining a high school diploma and it does not

include a community service requirement. Further, the legislature has determined Illinois public schools may only offer community service as an elective course, specifically stating schools may

offer a course involving "voluntary" community service. We affirm.

¶2 I. BACKGROUND

¶3 On September 24, 2014, plaintiff brought this action for a declaratory judgment

and to enjoin defendant from enforcing its policy requiring her child to complete six hours of

community service for each year of attendance at its high schools as a prerequisite to graduation.

She alleged the Code sets forth the high school graduation requirements for all students in the

State of Illinois and defendant is without legal authority to mandate service learning as an

additional requirement to graduate from Decatur public schools.

¶4 On October 1, 2014, plaintiff filed what she titled a "motion for declaratory

judgment," which set forth arguments much like a motion for summary judgment, i.e., there were

no issues of fact to be decided. She argues section 27-22 of the Code (105 ILCS 5/27-22 (West

2014)) sets forth both the minimum and maximum graduation requirements for students

attending Illinois public high schools and service learning, or community service, is not one of

the requirements. Further, the legislature has provided a school district may establish a volunteer

service credit program enabling secondary school students to earn credit toward graduation

through performance of community service. 105 ILCS 5/27-22.3 (West 2014). Thus, a school

board is prohibited from establishing a required service learning requirement for graduation.

¶5 On November 6, 2014, defendant filed its response and on November 14, 2014,

defendant filed a motion for summary judgment on the complaint. Defendant asserted there

were no facts to be decided. It cited section 10-20 of the Code (105 ILCS 5/10-20 (West 2014))

as authority for authorizing defendant to undertake any action not prohibited by law. Further,

-2- section 1.440(f) of Title 23 of the Illinois Administrative Code (23 Ill. Adm. Code 1.440(f),

amended at 38 Ill. Reg. 11203 (eff. May 6, 2014)) authorizes local boards of education to adopt

additional requirements for graduation in addition to those minimum requirements specified in

section 27-22 of the Code (105 ILCS 5/27-22 (West 2014)).

¶6 On December 17, 2014, a hearing was held on the cross-motions for summary

judgment and on December 18, 2014, the trial court entered an order granting defendant's motion

for summary judgment. The court noted section 27-22(e) of the Code (105 ILCS 5/27-22(e)

(West 2014)) itself begins with the following: "(e) As a prerequisite to receiving a high school

diploma, each pupil entering the 9th grade in the 2008-2009 school year or a subsequent school

year must, in addition to other course requirements, successfully complete all of the following

courses." (Emphasis added.) Thus, the Code contemplates other course requirements are

permissible and may be imposed by local school boards. The court also noted section 1.440(f) of

the Title 23 of the Illinois Administrative Code (23 Ill. Adm. Code 1.440(f), amended at 38 Ill.

Reg. 11203 (eff. May 6, 2014)) provides: "Additional requirements for graduation may be

adopted by local boards of education." The court found section 27-22.3 of the Code (105 ILCS

5/27-22.3 (West 2014)), which allows a voluntary service credit program, does not equate to

forbidding a mandatory service learning program such as that required by defendant.

¶7 This appeal followed.

¶8 II. ANALYSIS

¶9 A trial court's grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo. Carney v. Paul

Revere Life Insurance Co., 359 Ill. App. 3d 67, 73, 832 N.E.2d 257, 261 (2005).

¶ 10 A. Plain Language of Section 27-22 of the Code

-3- ¶ 11 Plaintiff argues section 27-22 of the Code (105 ILCS 5/27-22 (West 2014))

provides an exclusive list of courses required for students to graduate high school in Illinois.

The Code does not provide community service of any sort to be a prerequisite to graduation or

receipt of a high school diploma within the state.

¶ 12 Defendant does not dispute section 27-22 of the Code sets forth a list of courses

students must complete to receive a high school diploma. Defendant argues this list is the

minimum credit hours in specified subject areas necessary for graduation. Defendant contends

the legislature did not intend these requirements to be the maximum or exclusive courses local

school districts may require students to complete in order to earn a high school diploma. As

noted by the trial court, section 27-22(e) begins by stating each pupil must complete the

following courses "in addition to other course requirements." (Emphasis added.) 105 ILCS

5/27-22(e) (West 2014).

¶ 13 "The primary rule of statutory construction is to ascertain and give effect to the

intent of the legislature." Price v. Philip Morris, Inc., 219 Ill. 2d 182, 242, 848 N.E.2d 1, 37

(2005). To ascertain and give effect to the intent of the legislature, the court examines the

language of the statute, which is the most reliable indicator of the legislature's intent in enacting

the law. Id. The plain meaning of the language "in addition to other requirements" indicates the

legislature's intent completion of graduation requirements in addition to those listed in section

27-22 may be required of public high school students in Illinois.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Project Is 43:19, LLC Vanderburgh House, LLC
2025 IL App (4th) 241194 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 2025)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2015 IL App (4th) 141111, 39 N.E.3d 1136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/earl-v-decatur-public-schools-board-of-education-illappct-2015.