Earl v. Cotton

Supreme Court of Kansas

Earl v. Cotton

96 P. 348, 78 Kan. 405, 1908 Kan. LEXIS 73

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedJune 6, 1908

DocketNo. 15,578

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 96 P. 348 (Earl v. Cotton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Earl v. Cotton, 96 P. 348, 78 Kan. 405, 1908 Kan. LEXIS 73 (kan 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The demurrer to the petition was properly overruled. We find nothing substantial in the claim of error in the admission of testimony. Besides, the cause was tried to the court without a jury.

There was no abuse of discretion in appointing a guardian ad litem and permitting him to file an answer after the evidence was introduced and before the case was finally «decided, nor in approving the service 'of publication on the other defendants after the evidence was submitted.

The other assignments of error relate to the sufficiency and weight of the evidence. On a material issue of fact there was a conflict of evidence, and the decision of the trial court can not be disturbed.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI