Earl L. Hollon, Jr. v. Harry C. Tinsley, Warden, Colorado State Penitentiary
This text of 334 F.2d 762 (Earl L. Hollon, Jr. v. Harry C. Tinsley, Warden, Colorado State Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We are of the opinion that the record in this case establishes that the sentence imposed on the applicant for the writ of habeas corpus by the state court is invalid and his detention thereunder unlawful, but that the infirmity in the sentence does not extend to applicant’s plea of guilty. Therefore, the •order is reversed and the cause remanded, with instructions to enter an order discharging the applicant from custody under the sentence, but staying its effectiveness for 30 days to enable the state if it is so advised to take applicant before the state court in which his plea of guilty was entered for the imposition of valid sentence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
334 F.2d 762, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 4702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/earl-l-hollon-jr-v-harry-c-tinsley-warden-colorado-state-ca10-1964.