Earl Jason Lariscey v. The United States
This text of 981 F.2d 1244 (Earl Jason Lariscey v. The United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Earl Jason LARISCEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 90-5129.
United States Court of Appeals,
Federal Circuit.
Dec. 28, 1992.
Rehearing Denied March 3, 1993.
Appealed from U.S. Claims Court; Bohdan A. Futey, Judge.
John S. Moot, Washington, DC, argued, for plaintiff-appellant, on the brief on Rehearing In Banc. Also on the brief, for plaintiff-appellant were Buel White and Lewis B. Gardner.
Edward H. Rice, Dept. of Justice, argued, for defendant-appellee, on the brief on Rehearing In Banc, with him on the brief, were Stuart M. Gerson, and Vito J. DiPietro. Also on the brief, for defendant-appellee was Chun-I Chiang. Of counsel, was John Fargo.
Prior report: 20 Cl.Ct. 385; Fed.Cir., 949 F.2d 1137; 962 F.2d 1047.
Before NIES, Chief Judge, RICH, NEWMAN, ARCHER, MAYER, MICHEL, PLAGER, LOURIE, CLEVENGER, and RADER, Circuit Judges.*
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The judgment in the above appeal is affirmed by an equally divided court.
Circuit Judge Schall took no part in the decision of this case
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
981 F.2d 1244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/earl-jason-lariscey-v-the-united-states-cafc-1993.