Earl Jason Lariscey v. The United States

981 F.2d 1244
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided March 3, 1993·No. 90-5129·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

981 F.2d 1244

Earl Jason LARISCEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 90-5129.

United States Court of Appeals,
Federal Circuit.

Dec. 28, 1992.
Rehearing Denied March 3, 1993.

Appealed from U.S. Claims Court; Bohdan A. Futey, Judge.

John S. Moot, Washington, DC, argued, for plaintiff-appellant, on the brief on Rehearing In Banc. Also on the brief, for plaintiff-appellant were Buel White and Lewis B. Gardner.

Edward H. Rice, Dept. of Justice, argued, for defendant-appellee, on the brief on Rehearing In Banc, with him on the brief, were Stuart M. Gerson, and Vito J. DiPietro. Also on the brief, for defendant-appellee was Chun-I Chiang. Of counsel, was John Fargo.

Prior report: 20 Cl.Ct. 385; Fed.Cir., 949 F.2d 1137; 962 F.2d 1047.

Before NIES, Chief Judge, RICH, NEWMAN, ARCHER, MAYER, MICHEL, PLAGER, LOURIE, CLEVENGER, and RADER, Circuit Judges.*

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The judgment in the above appeal is affirmed by an equally divided court.

*

Circuit Judge Schall took no part in the decision of this case

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Earl Jason Lariscey v. The United States, 981 F.2d 1244 (Fed. Cir. 1993).

981 F.2d 1244 (Earl Jason Lariscey v. The United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Earl Jason Lariscey v. United States
65 F.3d 188 (Federal Circuit, 1995)