Earl Holmes v. State Department of Public Welfare

Fifth Circuit

Earl Holmes v. State Department of Public Welfare

370 F.2d 371, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 3903

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 27, 1966·No. 23317_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The district court, after a careful consideration of the complaint of the appellant, Earl Holmes, reached the conclusion that it had no jurisdiction over the appellant’s claims and entered an order of dismissal. On appeal this Court has given careful consideration to the case and is in agreement with the district court that the Federal courts do not have jurisdiction over the claims which the appellant seeks to assert. Therefore the judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The district court, after a careful consideration of the complaint of the appellant, Earl Holmes, reached the conclusion that it had no jurisdiction over the appellant’s claims and entered an order of dismissal. On appeal this Court has given careful consideration to the case and is in agreement with the district court that the Federal courts do not have jurisdiction over the claims which the appellant seeks to assert. Therefore the judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.

Earl Holmes v. State Department of Public Welfare, 370 F.2d 371, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 3903 (5th Cir. 1966).

Pincite

370 F.2d 371 (Earl Holmes v. State Department of Public Welfare) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.