Earl Garnett Boxley v. United States

385 F.2d 975, 128 U.S. App. D.C. 193, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6070
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJune 9, 1967
Docket20979_1
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 385 F.2d 975 (Earl Garnett Boxley v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Earl Garnett Boxley v. United States, 385 F.2d 975, 128 U.S. App. D.C. 193, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6070 (D.C. Cir. 1967).

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on for consideration on the record on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and the court having considered the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties, it is

Ordered and adjudged by this Court that this case be remanded to the District Court for a further hearing pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. § 3147(b) following the filing in the District Court by the *976 District of Columbia Bail Agency of a report concerning appellant, verified to the extent possible through sources provided to said Agency.

The Clerk is authorized to transmit a certified copy of this order to the Clerk of the District Court as promptly as the business of his office will permit.

WILBUR K. MILLER, Senior Circuit Judge, would affirm the judgment of the District Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Curtis Lee Allen, Jr. v. United States
386 F.2d 634 (D.C. Circuit, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
385 F.2d 975, 128 U.S. App. D.C. 193, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6070, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/earl-garnett-boxley-v-united-states-cadc-1967.