Earl E. Graham v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company
This text of 811 F.3d 434 (Earl E. Graham v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an earlier order of this Court, we granted a petition for rehearing en bane in this case. After that order was issued, Chief Judge Carnes discovered that he may be recused and, in an abundance of caution to avoid any appearance of impropriety, .he has recused himself from any participation in the decision of this case.
This court’s earlier order granting rehearing en banc is therefore VACATED. As a majority of the judges of this Court in *435 active service and eligible to hear it have voted in favor of granting rehearing en banc, it is ORDERED that this case will be reheard en banc. The panel’s opinion is VACATED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
811 F.3d 434, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 1746, 2016 WL 399081, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/earl-e-graham-v-rj-reynolds-tobacco-company-ca11-2016.