Earl Aaron v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 18, 2020
Docket13-20-00295-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Earl Aaron v. State (Earl Aaron v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Earl Aaron v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

NUMBERS 13-20-00295-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

EARL AARON, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE.

On Appeal from the 87th District Court of Freestone County, Texas.

ORDER OF ABATEMENT Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina Order Per Curiam

This appeal is before the Court on a pro se motion to appoint attorney. On October

23, 2020, appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed an Anders brief in this matter.

Appointment of new counsel rests within the sound discretion of the trial court.

Carroll v. State, 176 S.W.3d 249, 255 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, pet. ref'd). In

those circumstances where the appointment of counsel may be necessary, an appellate court should abate the proceeding to the trial court for determination of this issue.

Accordingly, we ABATE the appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court for further

proceedings consistent with this order.

Accordingly, we now ABATE this appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court

for further proceedings pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) and (3) of the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure. Upon remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means necessary to make

appropriate findings and recommendations concerning the following: (1) whether

appellant has been denied effective assistance of counsel; (2) whether appellant's

counsel should be removed; and (3) whether appellant is indigent and entitled to new

court-appointed counsel.

If the trial court determines that present counsel should be removed, and that

appellant is indigent and entitled to court-appointed counsel, the trial court shall appoint

new counsel to represent appellant in this appeal. If new counsel is appointed, the name,

address, telephone number, email address, and state bar number of said counsel shall

be included in an order appointing counsel.

The trial court shall cause its findings and recommendations, together with any

orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues, to be included in a supplemental

clerk's record. Furthermore, the trial court shall cause a supplemental reporter's record of

any proceedings to be prepared. The supplemental clerk's record and supplemental

reporter's record, if any, shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before the

expiration of thirty days from the date of this order.

It is so ordered.

PER CURIAM 2 Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 18th day of December, 2020.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carroll v. State
176 S.W.3d 249 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Earl Aaron v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/earl-aaron-v-state-texapp-2020.