Earl A. Hollis, Inc. v. Haas

489 So. 2d 34, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 292
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 29, 1986
DocketNos. 84-2034, 84-2078, 84-2211, 84-2376 and 85-83
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 489 So. 2d 34 (Earl A. Hollis, Inc. v. Haas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Earl A. Hollis, Inc. v. Haas, 489 So. 2d 34, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 292 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the jury s award to the broker in this case of $470,000 and the trial court’s addition of prejudgment interest. The record supports the award based on implied contract. Danieli Corporation v. Bryant, 399 So.2d 387 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Kerdyk v. Hammock Oaks Estates, Inc., 342 So.2d 833 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). We also affirm the trial court’s direction of a verdict in favor of the seller’s agent on the broker’s claim of tortious interference with an advantageous business relationship. West v. Troelstrup, 367 So.2d 253 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).

ANSTEAD and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., and GODERICH, MARIO P., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Richard Bertram, Inc. v. Sterling Bank & Trust
820 So. 2d 963 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
489 So. 2d 34, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/earl-a-hollis-inc-v-haas-fladistctapp-1986.