Earl A. Ernst v. A. G. Clemens and H. G. McBride and A. G. Clemens and H. G. McBride Doing Business as Ideal Manufacturing Company
195 F.2d 735, 93 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 352, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 4246
Opinion
We granted a rehearing in this case at which counsel were ■ permitted to expand arguments presented at the original hearing. In our first opinion, 9 Cir., 185 F.2d 231, we noted our reasons for affirming the decision of the lower court. The entire record has been carefully reexamined as a result of which we conclude that our original decision was correct
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Earl A. Ernst v. A. G. Clemens and H. G. McBride and A. G. Clemens and H. G. McBride Doing Business as Ideal Manufacturing Company, 195 F.2d 735, 93 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 352, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 4246 (9th Cir. 1952).
195 F.2d 735 (Earl A. Ernst v. A. G. Clemens and H. G. McBride and A. G. Clemens and H. G. McBride Doing Business as Ideal Manufacturing Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mudge v. Commissioner
27 T.C. 188 (U.S. Tax Court, 1956)
Estate of Mudge v. Commissioner
27 T.C. 188 (U.S. Tax Court, 1956)
Hubbard v. Commissioner
26 T.C. 183 (U.S. Tax Court, 1956)