Earhart v. State

67 Miss. 325
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1889
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 67 Miss. 325 (Earhart v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Earhart v. State, 67 Miss. 325 (Mich. 1889).

Opinion

Campbell, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

We must hold, either that the legislature, in amending § 2985 of the code by an act approved March 9, 1888, nullified the section by making it senseless and uncertain, so as to be unenforceable, or that it committed a clerical mistake in striking out two words more than was intended, viz : the words “ an attach.” The latter is the more probable, and to read the section as amended, retaining those two words, will accomplish what was manifestly the legislative purpose, and leave the law in force. We, therefore, adopt that view, and under it the section as amended will be read, “ any person, not being threatened with an attack, .... who carries concealed, etc.” It is true that an attack may be threatened by both persons and things, but no one could fail to understand that the attack against which one may arm himself and carry a weapon concealed is one by a person, in contemplation of the statute. The appellant should have been permitted to prove all that Tuttle had said indicating a threatened attack on him, and it should have been left to the jury to say whether or not he was threatened with an attack.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Love Petroleum Co. v. Stone
191 So. 417 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1939)
State ex rel. Otoe County Agricultural Ass'n v. Wallen
220 N.W. 688 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1928)
Roseberry v. Norsworthy
100 So. 514 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1924)
Williams v. Lee
97 So. 14 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1923)
State v. Ware
54 So. 854 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1912)
Board of Commissioners v. Scanlan
98 N.E. 801 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1912)
State v. Traylor
56 So. 521 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 Miss. 325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/earhart-v-state-miss-1889.