Eames v. Steamship Ingram

Fourth Circuit

Eames v. Steamship Ingram

24 F.2d 1016, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 2241, 1928 A.M.C. 583

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 1, 1928

DocketNo. 2622

StatusPublished

This text of 24 F.2d 1016 (Eames v. Steamship Ingram) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eames v. Steamship Ingram, 24 F.2d 1016, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 2241, 1928 A.M.C. 583 (4th Cir. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After a careful examination of the testimony, a majority of the court are of opinion, as was the trial judge, that the injury of libelant did not result from any negligence on the part of the steamship Ingram, her officers or crew, but from the accidental slipping of his own foot, for which the vessel was in no wise responsible. The decree of the District Court dismissing the libel is accordingly affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After a careful examination of the testimony, a majority of the court are of opinion, as was the trial judge, that the injury of libelant did not result from any negligence on the part of the steamship Ingram, her officers or crew, but from the accidental slipping of his own foot, for which the vessel was in no wise responsible. The decree of the District Court dismissing the libel is accordingly affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 F.2d 1016, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 2241, 1928 A.M.C. 583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eames-v-steamship-ingram-ca4-1928.