Home/Supreme Court of Louisiana/Eames v. Cutno

Eames v. Cutno

198 So. 3d 122, 2016 La. LEXIS 1677, 2016 WL 4498298
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedAugust 15, 2016
DocketNo. 2016-C-1551
StatusPublished

This text of 198 So. 3d 122 (Eames v. Cutno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eames v. Cutno, 198 So. 3d 122, 2016 La. LEXIS 1677, 2016 WL 4498298 (La. 2016).

Opinions

In re Betty Parker; Josephine Strong; Leila Eames; Med Cullins; — Plaintiffis); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of E, Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. I, No. 650302; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2016 CE 1054.

| tDeriied.

JOHNSON, C.J., concurs and assigns reasons. KNOLL, J., additionally concurs for the reasons assigned by Justice Clark. CLARK, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

U. S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton
514 U.S. 779 (Supreme Court, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
198 So. 3d 122, 2016 La. LEXIS 1677, 2016 WL 4498298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eames-v-cutno-la-2016.