Ealy v. LVMPD Detention Center

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nevada
DecidedJuly 9, 2021
Docket2:21-cv-00962
StatusUnknown

This text of Ealy v. LVMPD Detention Center (Ealy v. LVMPD Detention Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ealy v. LVMPD Detention Center, (D. Nev. 2021).

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3 MICHAEL D. EALY, Case No. 2:21-cv-00962-APG-DJA

4 Petitioner, v. ORDER 5 LVMPD DETENTION CENTER, et al., (ECF No. 1) 6 Respondents. 7 8 9 Pro se Petitioner Michael D. Ealy filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 10 U.S.C. § 2241 seeking release from the Clark County Detention Center where he was in the 11 custody. ECF No. 1-1. Ealy submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). ECF 12 No. 1. A notice was served on Ealy via U.S. Mail at his address of record. ECF No. 2. The 13 noticed was returned as undeliverable with a notation indicating that Ealy is not in custody at the 14 Clark County Detention Center. ECF No. 3. 15 The Local Rules of Practice require all parties, including habeas petitioners, to immediately 16 file with the court written notice of any change of address. LR IA 3-1, LR 2-2. The Local 17 Rules also warn that failure to comply may result in dismissal of the action, with or 18 without prejudice, or other sanctions as the court deems appropriate. Id. See also Carey v. King, 19 856 F.2d 1439, 1441 (9th Cir. 1988) (“A party, not the district court, bears the burden of keeping 20 the court apprised of any changes in his mailing address.”). 21 Petitioner has not filed a notice of change of address. As Petitioner has failed to comply 22 with the Local Rules, it is therefore ordered that this action is dismissed without prejudice. 23 I THEREFORE ORDER: 24 1. This action is dismissed without prejudice based on Petitioner’s failure to comply with 25 the Local Rules. 26 2. A certificate of appealability is denied as jurists of reason would not find dismissal of 27 /// 28 /// ] the petition to be debatable or wrong. 2 3. The Clerk of Court is instructed to enter final judgment accordingly and close this case. 3 Dated: July 9, 2021 oe ANDREW P. GORDON 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gregory Carey v. John E. King
856 F.2d 1439 (Ninth Circuit, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ealy v. LVMPD Detention Center, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ealy-v-lvmpd-detention-center-nvd-2021.