Ealey v. State
Opinion
Defendant was convicted of simple assault and burglary. The appeal is limited to the contention that the burglary count of the indictment is fatally defective. This count in pertinent part alleged that defendant "did without authority and with intent to commit a felony, did enter the dwelling house of. . .” State v. Lockhart, 24 Ga. 420 held that if a burglary indictment fails to specify the *293 felony which the defendant intended to commit, the defect is fatal. This case controls.
As no question is raised as to the conviction and sentence for simple assault we affirm that part of the judgment but reverse as to the conviction and sentence for burglary.
Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
221 S.E.2d 50 (Ealey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.