Ealey v. Hawley

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7375

WILLIAM THOMAS EALEY, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CHARLES HAWLEY; THOMAS BREEDLOVE; JANE DOE; JOHN KEKU, Doctor; DOCTOR LITES; DOCTOR BALOCH; DOCTOR SMITH; DOCTOR DANIELS; JOHN DOE; DOCTOR DAVENPORT; MS. KELLY; DOCTOR SHAH; V. L. EVANS; PERCY DAVIS; MR. BATTEN; LYNN PHILLIPS, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-95-490-CT-H)

Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 17, 1996

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Thomas Ealey, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Ealey v. Hawley, No. CA-95-490-CT-H (E.D.N.C. Aug. 23, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED