Eakin v. Eakin
63 Ill. 160
Opinion
The jury were fully justified in the conclusion, from the evidence, that the plaintiff below was the owner of only three-fourths of the piano.
As she claimed the entire .ownership, she could not recover in replevin under the proof.
The judgment is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Eakin v. Eakin, 63 Ill. 160 (Ill. 1872).
63 Ill. 160 (Eakin v. Eakin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Palmer v. Hurst
115 N.W. 516 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1908)