Eakin v. Eakin

63 Ill. 160
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1872
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 63 Ill. 160 (Eakin v. Eakin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eakin v. Eakin, 63 Ill. 160 (Ill. 1872).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The jury were fully justified in the conclusion, from the evidence, that the plaintiff below was the owner of only three-fourths of the piano.

As she claimed the entire .ownership, she could not recover in replevin under the proof.

The judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Palmer v. Hurst
115 N.W. 516 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 Ill. 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eakin-v-eakin-ill-1872.