Eakes v. South Dakota

Supreme Court

Eakes v. South Dakota

414 U.S. 1017, 94 S. Ct. 440, 38 L. Ed. 2d 310, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 1360

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedNovember 12, 1973

DocketNo. 73-270

StatusPublished

This text of 414 U.S. 1017 (Eakes v. South Dakota) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eakes v. South Dakota, 414 U.S. 1017, 94 S. Ct. 440, 38 L. Ed. 2d 310, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 1360 (1973).

Pincite

Opinions

Sup. Ct. S. D. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15 (1973); Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49 (1973); Kaplan v. California, 413 U. S. 115 [1018]*1018(1973); United States v. 12 200-Ft. Reels of Film, 413 U. S. 123 (1973); United States v. Orito, 413 U. S. 139 (1973); Heller v. New York, 413 U. S. 483 (1973); Roaden v. Kentucky, 413 U. S. 496 (1973); and Alexander v. Virginia, 413 U. S. 836 (1973).

Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that state obscenity regulation is prohibited by the Fourteenth and First Amendments (see Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 70 (Douglas, J., dissenting))., would grant certiorari in this case and reverse the judgment of conviction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sup. Ct. S. D. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15 (1973); Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49 (1973); Kaplan v. California, 413 U. S. 115 [1018]*1018(1973); United States v. 12 200-Ft. Reels of Film, 413 U. S. 123 (1973); United States v. Orito, 413 U. S. 139 (1973); Heller v. New York, 413 U. S. 483 (1973); Roaden v. Kentucky, 413 U. S. 496 (1973); and Alexander v. Virginia, 413 U. S. 836 (1973).

Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that state obscenity regulation is prohibited by the Fourteenth and First Amendments (see Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 70 (Douglas, J., dissenting))., would grant certiorari in this case and reverse the judgment of conviction.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

414 U.S. 1017, 94 S. Ct. 440, 38 L. Ed. 2d 310, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 1360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eakes-v-south-dakota-scotus-1973.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack