Eaker v. Floyd

81 S.E. 656, 97 S.C. 381, 1914 S.C. LEXIS 179
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedMay 6, 1914
Docket8840
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 81 S.E. 656 (Eaker v. Floyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eaker v. Floyd, 81 S.E. 656, 97 S.C. 381, 1914 S.C. LEXIS 179 (S.C. 1914).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Hydrick.

This is an appeal from an order of the Circuit Court granting a new trial in a case removed into that Court by appeal from a magistrate’s Court. 'It does not appear that the decision was influenced by any error of law, or that this Court could render judgment absolute upon the right of the appellant, if it should determine that no error was committed in granting the new trial. The order is, therefore, not appealable. Daughty v. Railroad Co., 92 S. C. 361, 75 S. E. 553; Kirkland v. Railway, 93 S. C. 574, 77 S. E. 709; Miller v. Railroad Co., 95 S. C. 471, 79 S. E. 645.

Appeal dismissed.

Mr. Justice Gage did not sit in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Snipes v. Davis, Director General
127 S.E. 447 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
81 S.E. 656, 97 S.C. 381, 1914 S.C. LEXIS 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eaker-v-floyd-sc-1914.