Eaken v. SAIF
This text of 456 P.3d 382 (Eaken v. SAIF) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Submitted on remand from the Oregon Supreme Court November 26, 2019, reversed January 23, 2020
In the Matter of the Compensation of William Joseph Eaken, Claimant. William Joseph EAKEN, Petitioner, v. SAIF CORPORATION and Astoria School District No. 1C, Respondents. Workers’ Compensation Board 1604004; A165038 456 P3d 382
On remand from the Oregon Supreme Court, Eaken v. SAIF, 365 Or 657, 451 P3d 610 (2019). Joe Di Bartolomeo and Di Bartolomeo Law Office, P.C., filed the briefs for petitioner. Julie Masters filed the brief for respondents. Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Egan, Chief Judge, and Powers, Judge. PER CURIAM Reversed. Caren v. Providence Health System Oregon, 365 Or 466, 446 P3d 67 (2019).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
456 P.3d 382, 301 Or. App. 852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eaken-v-saif-orctapp-2020.