Eaglet Corp. v. Banco Central de Nicaragua

Second Circuit

Eaglet Corp. v. Banco Central de Nicaragua

23 F.3d 641

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedApril 27, 1994

DocketNo. 1672, Docket 94-7043

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 23 F.3d 641 (Eaglet Corp. v. Banco Central de Nicaragua) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eaglet Corp. v. Banco Central de Nicaragua, 23 F.3d 641 (2d Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We affirm for substantially the reasons stated by the district court. See Eaglet Carp. v. Banco Central de Nicaragua, 839 F.Supp. 232 (S.D.N.Y.1993). However, because the dismissal of the complaint was for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, both parties agree that the dismissal must be without prejudice. Fed.R.Civ.P. 41; see generally Costello v. United States, 365 U.S. 265, 284-88, 81 S.Ct. 534, 544-46, 5 L.Ed.2d 551 (1961).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

We affirm for substantially the reasons stated by the district court. See Eaglet Carp. v. Banco Central de Nicaragua, 839 F.Supp. 232 (S.D.N.Y.1993). However, because the dismissal of the complaint was for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, both parties agree that the dismissal must be without prejudice. Fed.R.Civ.P. 41; see generally Costello v. United States, 365 U.S. 265, 284-88, 81 S.Ct. 534, 544-46, 5 L.Ed.2d 551 (1961).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 F.3d 641, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eaglet-corp-v-banco-central-de-nicaragua-ca2-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack