Eagles v. Kern

5 Whart. 144, 1840 Pa. LEXIS 190
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 13, 1840·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It is impossible to distinguish this case from Mas-ser v. Strickland. Judgment has been had against the constable for an official default; and according to the principle of that case, it conclusively -establishes the fact in a proceeding against his bail.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eagles v. Kern, 5 Whart. 144, 1840 Pa. LEXIS 190 (Pa. 1840).

5 Whart. 144 (Eagles v. Kern) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McIntyre Square Associates v. Evans
827 A.2d 446 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2003)
People ex rel. Heidinger v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
7 N.E.2d 472 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1937)
Stephens v. Shafer
3 N.W. 835 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1879)
Lloyd v. Barr
11 Pa. 41 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1849)