Eaglebank v. Korman

Fourth Circuit

Eaglebank v. Korman

565 F. App'x 164

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 4, 2014·No. No. 13-2051·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jonathan S. Korman appeals from the district court’s order upholding the bankruptcy court’s determination that his debt to Eaglebank was not dischargeable in his bankruptcy case, and denying him a discharge. We have reviewed the record and briefs filed by the parties, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Korman v. EagleBank, No. 8:12-cv-03449-PWG, 2013 WL 3816987 (D.Md. July 22, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Jonathan S. Korman appeals from the district court’s order upholding the bankruptcy court’s determination that his debt to Eaglebank was not dischargeable in his bankruptcy case, and denying him a discharge. We have reviewed the record and briefs filed by the parties, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Korman v. EagleBank, No. 8:12-cv-03449-PWG, 2013 WL 3816987 (D.Md. July 22, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Eaglebank v. Korman, 565 F. App'x 164 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

565 F. App'x 164 (Eaglebank v. Korman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.