Eaglebank v. Korman

565 F. App'x 164
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 4, 2014
DocketNo. 13-2051
StatusPublished

This text of 565 F. App'x 164 (Eaglebank v. Korman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eaglebank v. Korman, 565 F. App'x 164 (4th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jonathan S. Korman appeals from the district court’s order upholding the bankruptcy court’s determination that his debt to Eaglebank was not dischargeable in his bankruptcy case, and denying him a discharge. We have reviewed the record and briefs filed by the parties, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Korman v. EagleBank, No. 8:12-cv-03449-PWG, 2013 WL 3816987 (D.Md. July 22, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
565 F. App'x 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eaglebank-v-korman-ca4-2014.