Eagle White Lead Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission
This text of 188 F. 256 (Eagle White Lead Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Commerce Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The bill in this case is, for all practical purposes, the same as the bill in case No. 5, Receivers’ & Shippers’ Association of Cincinnati v. Interstate Commerce Commission and the Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co., 188 Fed. 242, and was filed for the same purpose. The cases were submitted together upon bill and demurrer.
For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in case No. 5, the demurrer in this case must be sustained and the bill dismissed.
ARCHBALD and MACK, Judges, dissenting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
188 F. 256, 1911 U.S. Commerce Ct. LEXIS 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eagle-white-lead-co-v-interstate-commerce-commission-com-1911.