Eagle White Lead Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission
188 F. 256, 1911 U.S. Commerce Ct. LEXIS 13
Opinion
The bill in this case is, for all practical purposes, the same as the bill in case No. 5, Receivers’ & Shippers’ Association of Cincinnati v. Interstate Commerce Commission and the Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co., 188 Fed. 242, and was filed for the same purpose. The cases were submitted together upon bill and demurrer.
For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in case No. 5, the demurrer in this case must be sustained and the bill dismissed.
ARCHBALD and MACK, Judges, dissenting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Eagle White Lead Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission, 188 F. 256, 1911 U.S. Commerce Ct. LEXIS 13 (Colo. 1911).
188 F. 256 (Eagle White Lead Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hooker v. Interstate Commerce Commission
188 F. 242 (Commerce Court, 1911)