Eagle Surgical Supply, Inc. v. Farmington Cas. Co.
This text of Eagle Surgical Supply, Inc. v. Farmington Cas. Co. (Eagle Surgical Supply, Inc. v. Farmington Cas. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
against
Farmington Casualty Co., Respondent.
Korsunskiy Legal Group, P.C. (Henry R. Guindi, Esq.), for appellant. Law Offices of Aloy O. Ibuzor (Gina Spiteri, Esq.), for respondent.
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Reginald A. Boddie, J.), entered September 8, 2015. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff had failed to appear for duly scheduled examinations under oath (EUOs).
Contrary to plaintiff's sole contention, the proof submitted by defendant was sufficient to demonstrate that plaintiff had failed to appear for the EUOs (see Stephen Fogel Psychological, P.C. v Progressive Cas. Ins. Co., 35 AD3d 720 [2006]).
Accordingly, the order is affirmed.
PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: November 16, 2018
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Eagle Surgical Supply, Inc. v. Farmington Cas. Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eagle-surgical-supply-inc-v-farmington-cas-co-nyappterm-2018.