Eagle Pedicab, Inc. v 109 W. 38th LLC 2026 NY Slip Op 30905(U) March 9, 2026 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 652054/2025 Judge: Phaedra F. Perry-Bond Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication.
file:///LRB-ALB-FS1/Vol1/ecourts/Process/covers/NYSUP.6520542025.NEW_YORK.001.LBLX038_TO.html[03/19/2026 3:45:56 PM] FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/10/2026 11:08 AM INDEX NO. 652054/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 14 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2026
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY
PRESENT: HON. PHAEDRA F. PERRY-BOND PART 35 Justice ---------------------------X INDEX NO. 652054/2025 EAGLE PEDICAB, INC., MOTION DATE 06/05/2025 Plaintiff, MOTION SEQ. NO. _ __:0=-:0:. . :.1_ _ - V-
109 WEST 38TH LLC, LEVY SILBERSTEIN, and JOHN DECISION + ORDER ON DOE MOTION Defendants. -------------------X The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number {Motion 001} 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 were read on this motion to/for DISMISS
Upon the foregoing documents, Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint
pursuant to CPLR 321 l(a)(l) and (a)(7) is granted in part and denied in part.
I. Background
On December 21, 2022, Plaintiff leased the premises at 109 West 38 th Street, New York,
New York (the "Premises") from Defendant 109 West 38 th LLC ("West 38 th LLC") to operate a
pedicab rental, sales, and repair business. On December 3, 2024, a fire occurred at the Premises
and the New York City Department of Buildings issued a full vacate order due to unsafe conditions
at the Premises. Allegedly, West 38th LLC did not take any steps to repair the Premises making it
impossible for Plaintiff to occupy it and conduct its business. Plaintiffs property at the Premises
was allegedly removed and sold via Facebook Marketplace without Plaintiffs consent. Plaintiff
now sues Defendants for recission of the Lease due to constructive eviction, conversion, and
breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment.
652054/2025 EAGLE PEDICAB, INC. vs. 109 WEST 38TH LLC ET AL Page 1 of 5 Motion No. 001
[* 1] 1 of 5 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/10/2026 11:08 AM INDEX NO. 652054/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 14 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2026
Defendants respond with this pre-answer motion to dismiss, arguing that the fire began at
the Premises because numerous lithium-ion batteries being stored by Plaintiff exploded, leading
the FDNY to issue a public statement about the dangers of electronic bikes. Defendants also argue
that notwithstanding the FDNY statement, Plaintiff fails to allege that the fire occurred through no
fault of its own, and therefore fails to allege the Defendants' duty to repair the Premises under the
Lease was triggered. Defendants further argue there can be no claim against Defendant Levy
Silberstein as he was not a party to the Lease and has no contractual privity with Plaintiff. Finally,
Defendants argue the conversion claim fails to allege a demand for its property was ever made and
refused. Plaintiff opposes.
II. Discussion
The motion is granted in part and denied in part. When reviewing a pre-answer motion to
dismiss for failure to state a claim, the Court accepts all factual allegations as true, gives claimant
the benefit of all favorable inferences which may be drawn from the pleadings, and determines
only whether the alleged facts fit within any cognizable legal theory (Sassi v Mobile Life Support
Services, Inc., 37 NY3d 236, 239 [2021]). However, conclusory allegations or bare legal
conclusions with no factual specificity are insufficient (Godfrey v Spano, 13 NY3d 358, 373
[2009]). A motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim will be granted if the factual allegations
do not allow for an enforceable right ofrecovery (Connaughton v Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., 29
NY3d 137, 142 [2017]). A motion to dismiss based on documentary evidence is appropriately
granted when the documentary evidence utterly refutes the plaintiffs factual allegations,
conclusively establishing a defense as a matter oflaw (Goshen v Mutual Life Ins. Co. ofNew York,
98 NY2d 314 [2002]).
652054/2025 EAGLE PEDICAB, INC. vs. 109 WEST 38TH LLC ET AL Page 2 of 5 Motion No. 001
[* 2] 2 of 5 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/10/2026 11:08 AM INDEX NO. 652054/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 14 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2026
To the extent that Plaintiff seeks recission of the lease due to constructive eviction and sues
for breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment against Silberstein, those claims are dismissed as
the lease annexed to Plaintiffs Complaint definitively establishes the only parties in contractual
privity are Plaintiff and West 38 th LLC.
Plaintiff is correct that the FDNY press release blaming the fire on lithium-ion batteries at
Plaintiff's store is not documentary evidence (see, e.g. Hill v New York City Health and Hospitals
Corp., 147 AD3d 430,430 [1st Dept 2017]). However, Plaintiffs Complaint is fatally silent as to
the cause of the fire. Because West 38th LLC's duty to restore the Premises is only triggered if the
fire was caused through no fault of Plaintiff, and Plaintiff fails to allege the fire was caused through
some other party's fault, the contract claims must be dismissed. 1 Specifically, the Lease states in
Article 16:
"If a fire or other casualty shall have been caused by any act or omission of Tenant or by any act or omission of any owner, member, shareholder, principal, manager, officer, director, employee, worker, contractor, subcontractor, customer, patron, client, invitee or assignee of Tenant or by any act or omission of any subtenant, licensee or occupant of the Premises then, notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Lease, Tenant shall remain obligated to pay all Fixed Rents and Additional Rents payable under this Lease (i.e., the Fixed Rents and Additional Rents shall not be eliminated, abated or reduced for any period) and Landlord shall not be required to repair, replace or restore the Structural Components or any other part of the Building and Tenant shall, at Tenant's expense, promptly repair, replace and restore the Structural Components, the Build-Out, all parts and components of the Premises and Building and Tenant's Equipment."
Plaintiff's failure to allege facts demonstrating that West 38th LLC's duty to repair was
triggered requires dismissal (see, e.g. M & E 73-75 LLC v 57 Fusion LLC, 189 AD3d 1, 6-7 [1st
Dept 2020]). Therefore, the recission and constructive eviction claim is insufficiently pled and are
dismissed.
1 Even in opposition, Plaintiff failed to amplify its pleadings and allege the fire was caused due to no fault of its own.
Plaintiff fails to even address the allegation that the fire was caused by its electronic bike business. 652054/2025 EAGLE PEDICAB, INC. vs. 109 WEST 38TH LLC ET AL Page 3 of5 Motion No. 001
[* 3] 3 of 5 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/10/2026 11:08 AM INDEX NO. 652054/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 14 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2026
Moreover, because Plaintiff failed to allege it performed all obligations under the Lease
(including not setting the Premises on fire by charging a dangerous number of lithium-ion
batteries), Plaintiff cannot assert a claim for the breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment (see
558 Seventh Ave.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Eagle Pedicab, Inc. v 109 W. 38th LLC 2026 NY Slip Op 30905(U) March 9, 2026 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 652054/2025 Judge: Phaedra F. Perry-Bond Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication.
file:///LRB-ALB-FS1/Vol1/ecourts/Process/covers/NYSUP.6520542025.NEW_YORK.001.LBLX038_TO.html[03/19/2026 3:45:56 PM] FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/10/2026 11:08 AM INDEX NO. 652054/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 14 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2026
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY
PRESENT: HON. PHAEDRA F. PERRY-BOND PART 35 Justice ---------------------------X INDEX NO. 652054/2025 EAGLE PEDICAB, INC., MOTION DATE 06/05/2025 Plaintiff, MOTION SEQ. NO. _ __:0=-:0:. . :.1_ _ - V-
109 WEST 38TH LLC, LEVY SILBERSTEIN, and JOHN DECISION + ORDER ON DOE MOTION Defendants. -------------------X The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number {Motion 001} 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 were read on this motion to/for DISMISS
Upon the foregoing documents, Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint
pursuant to CPLR 321 l(a)(l) and (a)(7) is granted in part and denied in part.
I. Background
On December 21, 2022, Plaintiff leased the premises at 109 West 38 th Street, New York,
New York (the "Premises") from Defendant 109 West 38 th LLC ("West 38 th LLC") to operate a
pedicab rental, sales, and repair business. On December 3, 2024, a fire occurred at the Premises
and the New York City Department of Buildings issued a full vacate order due to unsafe conditions
at the Premises. Allegedly, West 38th LLC did not take any steps to repair the Premises making it
impossible for Plaintiff to occupy it and conduct its business. Plaintiffs property at the Premises
was allegedly removed and sold via Facebook Marketplace without Plaintiffs consent. Plaintiff
now sues Defendants for recission of the Lease due to constructive eviction, conversion, and
breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment.
652054/2025 EAGLE PEDICAB, INC. vs. 109 WEST 38TH LLC ET AL Page 1 of 5 Motion No. 001
[* 1] 1 of 5 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/10/2026 11:08 AM INDEX NO. 652054/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 14 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2026
Defendants respond with this pre-answer motion to dismiss, arguing that the fire began at
the Premises because numerous lithium-ion batteries being stored by Plaintiff exploded, leading
the FDNY to issue a public statement about the dangers of electronic bikes. Defendants also argue
that notwithstanding the FDNY statement, Plaintiff fails to allege that the fire occurred through no
fault of its own, and therefore fails to allege the Defendants' duty to repair the Premises under the
Lease was triggered. Defendants further argue there can be no claim against Defendant Levy
Silberstein as he was not a party to the Lease and has no contractual privity with Plaintiff. Finally,
Defendants argue the conversion claim fails to allege a demand for its property was ever made and
refused. Plaintiff opposes.
II. Discussion
The motion is granted in part and denied in part. When reviewing a pre-answer motion to
dismiss for failure to state a claim, the Court accepts all factual allegations as true, gives claimant
the benefit of all favorable inferences which may be drawn from the pleadings, and determines
only whether the alleged facts fit within any cognizable legal theory (Sassi v Mobile Life Support
Services, Inc., 37 NY3d 236, 239 [2021]). However, conclusory allegations or bare legal
conclusions with no factual specificity are insufficient (Godfrey v Spano, 13 NY3d 358, 373
[2009]). A motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim will be granted if the factual allegations
do not allow for an enforceable right ofrecovery (Connaughton v Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., 29
NY3d 137, 142 [2017]). A motion to dismiss based on documentary evidence is appropriately
granted when the documentary evidence utterly refutes the plaintiffs factual allegations,
conclusively establishing a defense as a matter oflaw (Goshen v Mutual Life Ins. Co. ofNew York,
98 NY2d 314 [2002]).
652054/2025 EAGLE PEDICAB, INC. vs. 109 WEST 38TH LLC ET AL Page 2 of 5 Motion No. 001
[* 2] 2 of 5 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/10/2026 11:08 AM INDEX NO. 652054/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 14 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2026
To the extent that Plaintiff seeks recission of the lease due to constructive eviction and sues
for breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment against Silberstein, those claims are dismissed as
the lease annexed to Plaintiffs Complaint definitively establishes the only parties in contractual
privity are Plaintiff and West 38 th LLC.
Plaintiff is correct that the FDNY press release blaming the fire on lithium-ion batteries at
Plaintiff's store is not documentary evidence (see, e.g. Hill v New York City Health and Hospitals
Corp., 147 AD3d 430,430 [1st Dept 2017]). However, Plaintiffs Complaint is fatally silent as to
the cause of the fire. Because West 38th LLC's duty to restore the Premises is only triggered if the
fire was caused through no fault of Plaintiff, and Plaintiff fails to allege the fire was caused through
some other party's fault, the contract claims must be dismissed. 1 Specifically, the Lease states in
Article 16:
"If a fire or other casualty shall have been caused by any act or omission of Tenant or by any act or omission of any owner, member, shareholder, principal, manager, officer, director, employee, worker, contractor, subcontractor, customer, patron, client, invitee or assignee of Tenant or by any act or omission of any subtenant, licensee or occupant of the Premises then, notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Lease, Tenant shall remain obligated to pay all Fixed Rents and Additional Rents payable under this Lease (i.e., the Fixed Rents and Additional Rents shall not be eliminated, abated or reduced for any period) and Landlord shall not be required to repair, replace or restore the Structural Components or any other part of the Building and Tenant shall, at Tenant's expense, promptly repair, replace and restore the Structural Components, the Build-Out, all parts and components of the Premises and Building and Tenant's Equipment."
Plaintiff's failure to allege facts demonstrating that West 38th LLC's duty to repair was
triggered requires dismissal (see, e.g. M & E 73-75 LLC v 57 Fusion LLC, 189 AD3d 1, 6-7 [1st
Dept 2020]). Therefore, the recission and constructive eviction claim is insufficiently pled and are
dismissed.
1 Even in opposition, Plaintiff failed to amplify its pleadings and allege the fire was caused due to no fault of its own.
Plaintiff fails to even address the allegation that the fire was caused by its electronic bike business. 652054/2025 EAGLE PEDICAB, INC. vs. 109 WEST 38TH LLC ET AL Page 3 of5 Motion No. 001
[* 3] 3 of 5 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/10/2026 11:08 AM INDEX NO. 652054/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 14 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2026
Moreover, because Plaintiff failed to allege it performed all obligations under the Lease
(including not setting the Premises on fire by charging a dangerous number of lithium-ion
batteries), Plaintiff cannot assert a claim for the breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment (see
558 Seventh Ave. Corp. v E&B Barbers Inc., 237 AD3d 635, 635-636 [1st Dept 2025] ["in order
for a tenant to assert a claim for breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment, the tenant must have
performed all obligations which are a condition precedent to its right to insist upon the covenant"]).
However, accepting the facts alleged as true, and in the absence of any documentary
evidence definitively contradicting Plaintiffs allegations, Plaintiff sufficiently alleged claims for
conversion against Defendants. Specifically, Plaintiff alleges Defendants seized its property
without its permission and sold it, without Plaintiffs knowledge, on Facebook Marketplace. This
is sufficient for a pre-answer motion to dismiss (see, e.g. Reifv Nagy, 175 AD3d 107 [1st Dept
2019] [conversion occurs when someone, intentionally and without authority, exercises control
over personal property belonging to someone else, interfering with that person's right of
possession]). Therefore, the motion to dismiss is denied as to Plaintiffs conversion claim but is
otherwise granted. The Court has considered the parties' remaining contentions and finds them to
be unavailing.
Accordingly, it is hereby,
ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss the first and third causes of action are
granted, but the motion to dismiss the second cause of action alleging conversion is denied; and it
is further
ORDERED that within twenty days of entry, Defendants shall serve an Answer to what
remains of Plaintifr s Complaint; and it is further
652054/2025 EAGLE PEDICAB, INC. vs. 109 WEST 38TH LLC ET AL Page 4 of 5 Motion No. 001
[* 4] 4 of 5 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/10/2026 11:08 AM INDEX NO. 652054/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 14 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2026
ORDERED that ORDERED that the parties shall meet and confer immediately and shall
submit a proposed preliminary conference order to the Court via e-mail, but in no event shall the
proposed preliminary conference order be submitted any later than April 21, 2026. If there is a
serious discovery dispute preventing the parties from entering a proposed order, they shall notify
the Court via e-mail so an in-person conference can be scheduled; and it is further
ORDERED that if the parties wish to resolve this dispute through the Court's sponsored
ADR program, they shall notify the Court so the appropriate referral order may be issued; and it
ORDERED that within ten days of entry, counsel for Defendant shall serve a copy of this
Decision and Order, with notice of entry, on all parties via NYSCEF.
This constitutes the Decision and Order of the Court.
DATE QL/£!L HON. PHAEDRA F. PERRY-BOND, J.S.C.
~ CHECK ONE: CASE DISPOSED ~ NON-FINAL DISPOSITION GRANTED □ DENIED x GRANTED IN PART □ OTHER APPLICATION: SETTLE ORDER SUBMIT ORDER CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: INCLUDES TRANSFER/REASSIGN FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT □ REFERENCE
652054/2025 EAGLE PEDICAB, INC. vs. 109 WEST 38TH LLC ET AL Page 5of5 Motion No. 001
[* 5] 5 of 5