Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Eagle Nest Corp. v. Carroll

Eagle Nest Corp. v. Carroll

265 A.D. 985, 38 N.Y.S.2d 599, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6828
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 29, 1942
StatusPublished

This text of 265 A.D. 985 (Eagle Nest Corp. v. Carroll) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eagle Nest Corp. v. Carroll, 265 A.D. 985, 38 N.Y.S.2d 599, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6828 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Opinion

Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Schenek and Foster, JJ., concur; Crapser, J., dissents. The plaintiff’s first cause of action is framed in equity and does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action because it does not show that the plaintiff has such a separate individual or peculiar interest and injury as would justify such an action. (Roosevelt v. Draper, 23 N. Y. 318; Demarest v. Wickham, 63 N. Y. 320; Doolittle v. Supervisors, 18 N. Y. 155; Altschul v. Ludwig, 216 N. Y. 459.) [179 Misc. 99.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Demarest v. . Wickham
63 N.Y. 320 (New York Court of Appeals, 1875)
Doolittle v. . Supervisors of Broome County
18 N.Y. 155 (New York Court of Appeals, 1858)
Roosevelt v. . Draper
23 N.Y. 318 (New York Court of Appeals, 1861)
Altschul v. . Ludwig
111 N.E. 216 (New York Court of Appeals, 1916)
Eagle Nest Corp. v. Carroll
179 Misc. 99 (New York Supreme Court, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
265 A.D. 985, 38 N.Y.S.2d 599, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6828, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eagle-nest-corp-v-carroll-nyappdiv-1942.