Eagle Nest Corp. v. Carroll
265 A.D. 985, 38 N.Y.S.2d 599, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6828
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 29, 1942·Published
Opinion
Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Schenek and Foster, JJ., concur; Crapser, J., dissents. The plaintiff’s first cause of action is framed in equity and does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action because it does not show that the plaintiff has such a separate individual or peculiar interest and injury as would justify such an action. (Roosevelt v. Draper, 23 N. Y. 318; Demarest v. Wickham, 63 N. Y. 320; Doolittle v. Supervisors, 18 N. Y. 155; Altschul v. Ludwig, 216 N. Y. 459.) [179 Misc. 99.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Eagle Nest Corp. v. Carroll, 265 A.D. 985, 38 N.Y.S.2d 599, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6828 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).
265 A.D. 985 (Eagle Nest Corp. v. Carroll) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Demarest v. . Wickham
63 N.Y. 320 (New York Court of Appeals, 1875)
Doolittle v. . Supervisors of Broome County
18 N.Y. 155 (New York Court of Appeals, 1858)
Roosevelt v. . Draper
23 N.Y. 318 (New York Court of Appeals, 1861)
Altschul v. . Ludwig
111 N.E. 216 (New York Court of Appeals, 1916)
Eagle Nest Corp. v. Carroll
179 Misc. 99 (New York Supreme Court, 1942)