Eagle Insurance v. Suarez

223 A.D.2d 542, 636 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 180

This text of 223 A.D.2d 542 (Eagle Insurance v. Suarez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eagle Insurance v. Suarez, 223 A.D.2d 542, 636 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 180 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Cannizzaro, J.H.O.), dated July 20, 1995, which granted the petition and permanently stayed arbitration.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the Supreme Court’s finding of permissive use of the insured vehicle was based upon a fair interpretation of the evidence (see, Bouloukos v Blank, 202 AD2d 539, 540; Vehicle and Traffic Law § 388 [1]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the petition to permanently stay arbitration of the uninsured motorist claim. Mangano, P. J., Miller, Santucci and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bouloukos v. Blank
202 A.D.2d 539 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
223 A.D.2d 542, 636 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eagle-insurance-v-suarez-nyappdiv-1996.