Eagle Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

5 A.D.3d 384, 771 N.Y.S.2d 899, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2193

This text of 5 A.D.3d 384 (Eagle Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eagle Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, 5 A.D.3d 384, 771 N.Y.S.2d 899, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2193 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to vacate an arbitration award, the petitioner appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Phelan, J.), dated October 22, 2002, which denied the petition, confirmed the award, and, in effect, dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

“An arbitration award in a mandatory arbitration proceeding, such as this one, will be upheld if it is supported by the evidence and is not arbitrary and capricious” (Matter of Sari M. Friedman, P.C. v Gleeson, 300 AD2d 404 [2002] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Matter of Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp. v Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 89 NY2d 214, 223 [1996]; Matter of Ryan & Henderson v Haviv, 309 AD2d 939, 940 [2003]). Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the arbitration panel’s determination was amply supported by the evidence in the record, and was not arbitrary and capricious (see Matter of Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp. v Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., supra). S. Miller, J.P., H. Miller, Crane and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sari M. Friedman, P.C. v. Gleeson
300 A.D.2d 404 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Ryan & Henderson v. Haviv
309 A.D.2d 939 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 A.D.3d 384, 771 N.Y.S.2d 899, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eagle-insurance-v-state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-nyappdiv-2004.