Eagle Insurance v. Punctual Express, Inc.
This text of 251 A.D.2d 536 (Eagle Insurance v. Punctual Express, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In a declaratory judgment action, Nestor Bailly, an infant, by his father and natural guardian Nicholas Bailly, appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCaffrey, J.), dated June 26, 1997, which declared that the plaintiff is under no duty to defend or indemnify the defendants Punctual Express, Inc., and AA Punctual Airport Service, Inc., in an underlying negligence action entitled Bailly v Punctual Express, pending in the Supreme Court, New York County, under Index No. 101763/93.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Despite the alleged representations of the plaintiffs employee to the appellant, the plaintiff established that it did not issue a policy of insurance liability to Punctual Express, Inc., covering the vehicle or date in question. Thus, because a policy of insurance between the plaintiff and the alleged tortfeasor never existed, it cannot be created by equitable estoppel (see, Van Buren v Employers Ins., 98 AD2d 774, 775).
[537]*537We decline to reach the appellant’s remaining contention, as it is raised for the first time on this appeal (see, Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Bieder, 212 AD2d 693; Miller Org. v Vasap Constr. Corp., 184 AD2d 763). Pizzuto, J. P., Santucci, Altman and Luciano, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
251 A.D.2d 536, 673 N.Y.S.2d 926, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eagle-insurance-v-punctual-express-inc-nyappdiv-1998.