Eagle Insurance v. Brown

309 A.D.2d 749, 765 N.Y.S.2d 273
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 6, 2003
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 309 A.D.2d 749 (Eagle Insurance v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eagle Insurance v. Brown, 309 A.D.2d 749, 765 N.Y.S.2d 273 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration of a claim for uninsured motorist benefits, the petitioner appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.), entered September 20, 2002, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding, and (2) an order of the same court dated December 11, 2002, which denied its motion for leave to reargue or renew the prior motion.

Ordered that the order entered September 20, 2002, is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the petition is granted, and arbitration is permanently stayed; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order dated December 11, 2002, as denied that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for leave to reargue is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies from an order denying leave to reargue, and the appeal from so much of the order dated December 11, 2002, as denied that branch of the motion which was for leave to renew is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements, in light of our determination on the appeal from the order dated September 20, 2002.

[750]*750Contrary to the Supreme Court’s determination, the petitioner established that it properly commenced this proceeding to stay arbitration by filing the petition with the Clerk of the Supreme Court and purchasing an index number (see CPLR 304). Moreover, since the petitioner made an unopposed showing that the respondent failed, among other things, to report the alleged hit-and-run accident to the police within 24 hours, and failed to notify the petitioner of the uninsured motorist claim as soon as practicable, the petition for a permanent stay of arbitration should have been granted (see Matter of Interboro Mut. Indem. Ins. Co. v Brown, 300 AD2d 660 [2002]; Matter of Government Empls. Ins. Co. v Snell, 286 AD2d 682 [2001]; State Farm Mut. Ins. Co. v Genao, 210 AD2d 340 [1994]; Matter of United States Fire Ins. Co. v Williams, 166 AD2d 538 [1990]). Florio, J.P., S. Miller, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Progressive Direct Ins. Co. v. Ostapenko
2019 NY Slip Op 7586 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Matter of Country-Wide Ins. Co. v. Chaudry
2019 NY Slip Op 2867 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Matter of Geico Ins. Co. v. Silverio
2019 NY Slip Op 2705 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Matter of American Commerce Ins. Co. v. Nowicki
120 A.D.3d 670 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Government Employees Insurance v. Bartlett
112 A.D.3d 826 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Government Employees Insurance v. Baik
94 A.D.3d 888 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Interboro Insurance v. Coronel
54 A.D.3d 342 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Progressive Northeastern Insurance v. Frenkel
8 A.D.3d 390 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Mears
7 A.D.3d 533 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
309 A.D.2d 749, 765 N.Y.S.2d 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eagle-insurance-v-brown-nyappdiv-2003.