Eagle Insurance v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Eagle Insurance v. Brown

205 A.D.2d 774, 614 N.Y.S.2d 913, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6555

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 27, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 205 A.D.2d 774 (Eagle Insurance v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eagle Insurance v. Brown, 205 A.D.2d 774, 614 N.Y.S.2d 913, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6555 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to stay arbitration under an insurance policy, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated December 22, 1992, which granted the petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The record reveals no proof that the appellant purchased underinsured motorists coverage pursuant to Insurance Law § 3420 (f) (2) (see, Country Wide Ins. Co. v Dumawal, 200 AD2d 353; Matter of Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v Annunziato, 187 AD2d 429; Matter of Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v Alberto, 186 AD2d 658). Therefore, the Supreme Court correctly granted the insurer’s petition to stay arbitration. Mangano, P. J., Balletta, O’Brien, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to stay arbitration under an insurance policy, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated December 22, 1992, which granted the petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The record reveals no proof that the appellant purchased underinsured motorists coverage pursuant to Insurance Law § 3420 (f) (2) (see, Country Wide Ins. Co. v Dumawal, 200 AD2d 353; Matter of Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v Annunziato, 187 AD2d 429; Matter of Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v Alberto, 186 AD2d 658). Therefore, the Supreme Court correctly granted the insurer’s petition to stay arbitration. Mangano, P. J., Balletta, O’Brien, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

205 A.D.2d 774, 614 N.Y.S.2d 913, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eagle-insurance-v-brown-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack