Eager v. Hackensack
196 A. 739, 119 N.J.L. 430
This text of 196 A. 739 (Eager v. Hackensack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Eager v. Hackensack, 196 A. 739, 119 N.J.L. 430 (N.J. 1938).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, LLOYD, BODINE, DONGES, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, WALKER, JJ. 11.
For reversal — HEHER, J. 1. *Page 431
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
196 A. 739, 119 N.J.L. 430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eager-v-hackensack-nj-1938.