Eager v. Hackensack
196 A. 739, 119 N.J.L. 430
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, LLOYD, BODINE, DONGES, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, WALKER, JJ. 11.
For reversal — HEHER, J. 1. *Page 431
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Eager v. Hackensack, 196 A. 739, 119 N.J.L. 430 (N.J. 1938).
196 A. 739 (Eager v. Hackensack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.