Eagan v. Maguire Penniman

42 A. 506, 21 R.I. 189, 1899 R.I. LEXIS 3
CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island
DecidedFebruary 10, 1899
StatusPublished

This text of 42 A. 506 (Eagan v. Maguire Penniman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eagan v. Maguire Penniman, 42 A. 506, 21 R.I. 189, 1899 R.I. LEXIS 3 (R.I. 1899).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The first exception in the petition was not pressed.

*190 John W. Hogan, for plaintiff. James M. Ripley and John Henshaw, for defendants.

(1) We think the second exception must be overruled. The fact that the plaintiff’s intestate was engaged in the work of his ordinary calling at the time of the accident, and that it was on Sunday, do not constitute a defence to the action, since the labor on Sunday was not the immediate and proximate cause of the accident. Baldwin v. Barney, 12 R. I. 892.

Petition for new trial denied and dismissed, and case remitted to the Common Pleas Division with direction to enter judgment upon the verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 A. 506, 21 R.I. 189, 1899 R.I. LEXIS 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eagan-v-maguire-penniman-ri-1899.