Eagan v. Hinch
This text of 1 Ky. 93 (Eagan v. Hinch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Kentucky Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The only material questions arising in this suit, which have been submitted to the court, seem to be:
First. Was a dividing line between the two pre-emptions agreed on by the original claimants, Eagan and Conway to intersect at the half way point, a line which would pass through the center of their improvements, and to run at right angles thereto ?
Second. Was this dividing line made known to, and acquiesced in by Hinch and Jack, who purchased the said Conway’s pre-emption ? Both points having been proved in the affirmative, to the satisfaction of the court, they are of opinion that the defendants Hinch and Jack are bound thereby; and therefore that the complainant Eagan recover from the said defendants all the land contained within their survey contrary to the said agreement, and the same is decreed accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Ky. 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eagan-v-hinch-ky-1793.