Eagan v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
This text of 252 A.D. 791 (Eagan v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff wife sued to recover for personal injuries [792]*792sustained when she tripped and fell over a carton containing groceries that had been placed behind her, on the floor, by one of defendant’s clerks. Her husband’s action was to recover for medical expenses and loss of services. Judgments in favor of plaintiffs affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur; Adel and Taylor, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and grant a new trial on the ground that the verdicts are against the greater weight of the credible evidence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
252 A.D. 791, 300 N.Y.S. 707, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eagan-v-great-atlantic-pacific-tea-co-nyappdiv-1937.