Eagan v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Eagan v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

252 A.D. 791, 300 N.Y.S. 707, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6308

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 29, 1937·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The plaintiff wife sued to recover for personal injuries [792]*792sustained when she tripped and fell over a carton containing groceries that had been placed behind her, on the floor, by one of defendant’s clerks. Her husband’s action was to recover for medical expenses and loss of services. Judgments in favor of plaintiffs affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur; Adel and Taylor, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and grant a new trial on the ground that the verdicts are against the greater weight of the credible evidence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiff wife sued to recover for personal injuries [792]*792sustained when she tripped and fell over a carton containing groceries that had been placed behind her, on the floor, by one of defendant’s clerks. Her husband’s action was to recover for medical expenses and loss of services. Judgments in favor of plaintiffs affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur; Adel and Taylor, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and grant a new trial on the ground that the verdicts are against the greater weight of the credible evidence.

Eagan v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 252 A.D. 791, 300 N.Y.S. 707, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6308 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

252 A.D. 791 (Eagan v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related