Eagan v. Florida Industrial Commission
217 So. 2d 293
Opinion
Relator suggests the issuance of a writ of prohibition based on the alleged prejudice of the members of the respondent Commission in a workmen’s compensation matter. After hearing oral argument we have the view that the prejudice alleged is directed, if at all, against relator’s attorney, rather than relator himself. We find in the record no basis for a conclusion that the claims of relator will not be fairly and impartially heard by the respondent Commission.
The writ of prohibition is denied.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Eagan v. Florida Industrial Commission, 217 So. 2d 293 (Fla. 1968).
217 So. 2d 293 (Eagan v. Florida Industrial Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
DADE COUNTY CLASSROOM TEACHERS'ASS'N v. Rubin
238 So. 2d 284 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1970)
DADE COUNTY CLASSROOM TEACHERS'ASS'N, INC. v. Rubin
217 So. 2d 293 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1968)