Eagan v. Florida Industrial Commission
This text of 217 So. 2d 293 (Eagan v. Florida Industrial Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Relator suggests the issuance of a writ of prohibition based on the alleged prejudice of the members of the respondent Commission in a workmen’s compensation matter. After hearing oral argument we have the view that the prejudice alleged is directed, if at all, against relator’s attorney, rather than relator himself. We find in the record no basis for a conclusion that the claims of relator will not be fairly and impartially heard by the respondent Commission.
The writ of prohibition is denied.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
217 So. 2d 293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eagan-v-florida-industrial-commission-fla-1968.