Eady v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Eady v. State

920 So. 2d 1158, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1410, 2006 WL 264767

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 6, 2006

DocketNo. 1D05-5637

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 920 So. 2d 1158 (Eady v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eady v. State, 920 So. 2d 1158, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1410, 2006 WL 264767 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because the notice of appeal was not filed within 30 days of rendition of the order identified therein, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We note that the order identified in the notice of appeal, which we surmise denied appel[1159]*1159lant’s motion to suppress, is not independently appealable by a defendant in a criminal proceeding. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.410(b). Such an order may be reviewed on plenary appeal from a final, appealable order, and to the extent such an order has been rendered in the proceedings below and, as appellant appears to claim, his trial counsel neglected to comply with his request to pursue a timely appeal, our dismissal of this proceeding is without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek a belated appeal by filing a petition complying with the provisions of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c).

DISMISSED.

ALLEN, BENTON and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Because the notice of appeal was not filed within 30 days of rendition of the order identified therein, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We note that the order identified in the notice of appeal, which we surmise denied appel[1159]*1159lant’s motion to suppress, is not independently appealable by a defendant in a criminal proceeding. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.410(b). Such an order may be reviewed on plenary appeal from a final, appealable order, and to the extent such an order has been rendered in the proceedings below and, as appellant appears to claim, his trial counsel neglected to comply with his request to pursue a timely appeal, our dismissal of this proceeding is without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek a belated appeal by filing a petition complying with the provisions of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c).

DISMISSED.

ALLEN, BENTON and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

920 So. 2d 1158, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1410, 2006 WL 264767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eady-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack