Eady v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Eady v. State

773 So. 2d 621, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16137, 2000 WL 1807529

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 12, 2000

DocketNo. 1D00-2472

StatusPublished

This text of 773 So. 2d 621 (Eady v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eady v. State, 773 So. 2d 621, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16137, 2000 WL 1807529 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges an order denying his motion seeking postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm the summary denial of the claim seeking resentencing under Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000). However, the trial court failed to address the appellant’s facially sufficient claim seeking jail credit for time spent in prison. Therefore, we reverse the summary denial of this claim and remand for the trial court to consider it on the merits. See Corpus v. State, 744 So.2d 594 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); State v. Holmes, 360 So.2d 380 (Fla.1978.)

AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part.

BARFIELD, C.J., WEBSTER AND VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges an order denying his motion seeking postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm the summary denial of the claim seeking resentencing under Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000). However, the trial court failed to address the appellant’s facially sufficient claim seeking jail credit for time spent in prison. Therefore, we reverse the summary denial of this claim and remand for the trial court to consider it on the merits. See Corpus v. State, 744 So.2d 594 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); State v. Holmes, 360 So.2d 380 (Fla.1978.)

AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part.

BARFIELD, C.J., WEBSTER AND VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

773 So. 2d 621, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16137, 2000 WL 1807529, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eady-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack