Eady v. State
369 So. 2d 843
Opinion
We deny the writ because there was no proof to show the petitioner escaped from "the custody of the Sheriff of Houston County, Alabama, who had him in charge under authority of law.. . ." (emphasis added) as charged in the indictment. There is no conflict with Jenkins v. State,
WRIT DENIED.
BLOODWORTH, FAULKNER, ALMON and EMBRY, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Eady v. State, 369 So. 2d 843 (Ala. 1979).
369 So. 2d 843 (Eady v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Wright
976 So. 2d 1053 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2007)
Ex Parte Jones
530 So. 2d 877 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1988)
Grantham v. State
540 So. 2d 775 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1987)
Allen v. State
481 So. 2d 418 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1985)
Andrews v. State
473 So. 2d 1211 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1985)
Ex Parte Dietz
474 So. 2d 127 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1985)
Oliver v. State
466 So. 2d 159 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1984)
Alexander v. State
475 So. 2d 625 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1984)
Grimes v. State
402 So. 2d 1094 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1981)