Eades v. Ruprecht Building Materials Co.

199 S.W.3d 909, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1279, 2006 WL 2472918
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 29, 2006·No. Nos. ED 87408, ED 87409, ED 87439·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Broker, Paul D. Eades and RealPro, L.L.C.,1 appeals the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Sellers, Ru-precht Building Materials Company, Breckenridge Material Company, Lawrence J. Rhea, Jr., Trustee of the Lawrence J. Rhea Trust, and Wilma Deibel, and against Broker on Broker’s claim for a real estate commission and to enforce a real estate broker’s lien. Sellers (excluding Wilma Deibel) cross-appeal the trial court’s award of attorneys’ fees.

We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(5).2

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eades v. Ruprecht Building Materials Co., 199 S.W.3d 909, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1279, 2006 WL 2472918 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

199 S.W.3d 909 (Eades v. Ruprecht Building Materials Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.