Eaddy v. Astrue

Fourth Circuit

Eaddy v. Astrue

537 F. App'x 210

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedAugust 6, 2013

DocketNo. 13-1396

StatusPublished

This text of 537 F. App'x 210 (Eaddy v. Astrue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eaddy v. Astrue, 537 F. App'x 210 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Patricia A. Eaddy appeals the district court’s order upholding the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision to reduce her widow’s benefits. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Eaddy v. Astrue, No. 8:11-cv-02307-TMD, 2013 WL 398665 (D.Md. Jan. 31, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Patricia A. Eaddy appeals the district court’s order upholding the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision to reduce her widow’s benefits. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Eaddy v. Astrue, No. 8:11-cv-02307-TMD, 2013 WL 398665 (D.Md. Jan. 31, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

537 F. App'x 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eaddy-v-astrue-ca4-2013.