Eachus v. Big Daddy's Lounges, Inc.
This text of 380 So. 2d 1154 (Eachus v. Big Daddy's Lounges, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Kathryn E. EACHUS et Vir., Appellants,
v.
BIG DADDY'S LOUNGES, INC., Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Joe N. Unger, Richard M. Walsh & Associates, Miami, for appellants.
Bradford, Williams, McKay, Kimbrell, Hamann, Kennings & Kniskern and John W. Wylie, Miami, for appellee.
Before BARKDULL and BASKIN, JJ., and EZELL, BOYCE F., Jr. (Ret.), Associate Judge.
PER CURIAM.
This is a slip and fall case, in which the trial court entered summary judgment for the defendant.
It is a question of fact as to whether or not a parking lot constructed adjacent to the appellee's lounge, wherein a concrete bumper was placed in the lot in the proximity of a walkway which was designated to be used by the patrons, constituted a negligent design. We think this is an issue of fact which should have been resolved by a finder of fact. Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla. 1966); Luckey v. City of Orlando, 264 So.2d 99 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972); Wills v. Sears, Roebuck & Company, 351 So.2d 29 (Fla. 1977). Therefore, we reverse the summary judgment under review and return the matter to the trial court for further proceedings.
Reversed and remanded, with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
380 So. 2d 1154, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16083, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eachus-v-big-daddys-lounges-inc-fladistctapp-1980.