E.A.C., A CHILD v. STATE OF FLORIDA
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
E.A.C., a Child, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D20-2079
[August 18, 2021]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Kathleen J. Kroll, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2020-CJ- 000147-XXXX-MB.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Erika Follmer, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rachael Kaiman, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
ON MOTION TO CERTIFY A QUESTION OF GREAT PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
PER CURIAM.
We grant the motion to certify a question of great public importance.
The supreme court has discretionary jurisdiction to review decisions of the district courts which pass upon a question certified to be of great public importance. Fla. R. App. P. 9.030(a)(2)(A)(v). The majority decision passes upon such a question. We therefore certify the following question to the supreme court as one of great public importance.
Do witnesses appearing in a juvenile adjudicatory hearing by Zoom during a global pandemic constitute a per se violation of the defendant’s due process rights?
MAY, CIKLIN, and LEVINE, JJ., concur.
* * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
E.A.C., A CHILD v. STATE OF FLORIDA (E.A.C., A CHILD v. STATE OF FLORIDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.