Home/Court of Appeals of Texas/E_T_J v. State

E_T_J v. State

753 S.W.2d 487
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 24, 1988
DocketNo. 05-88-00390-CV
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 753 S.W.2d 487 (E_T_J v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
E_T_J v. State, 753 S.W.2d 487 (Tex. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinions

ORDER

BAKER, Justice.

The civil rules of appellate procedure apply in this cause. TEX.FAM.CODE ANN. sec. 56.01(b) (Vernon 1986); cf. Tinker v. State, 561 S.W.2d 200, 201 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978). Therefore, our jurisdiction to consider a motion to extend the time to file the statement of facts expired on May 3, 1988. Chojnacki v. First Court of Appeals, 699 S.W.2d 193, passim (Tex.1985) (per curiam). Accordingly, appellant’s May 18, 1988 motion to compel for late filing of statement of facts is DENIED.

KINKEADE, J., dissenting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

M.B. v. State
894 S.W.2d 82 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1995)
S.D.G., Matter Of
861 S.W.2d 106 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1993)
in the Matter of S.D.G.
Court of Appeals of Texas, 1993
E______T______J______ v. State
753 S.W.2d 487 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
753 S.W.2d 487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/e_t_j-v-state-texapp-1988.