E. Weed v. Ellis
1 Cai. Cas. 115
This text of 1 Cai. Cas. 115 (E. Weed v. Ellis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
E. Weed v. Ellis, 1 Cai. Cas. 115 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1803).
Opinion
The Court ruled that a younger issue being tried, is not always conclusive that a cause might have been brought [163]*163on.
Radcliff and Livingston, Justices, absent.
S. P. Jackson v. Valentine, 3 Caines’ Rep. 128. See Jackson v. Chamberlin, post, 171.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Cai. Cas. 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/e-weed-v-ellis-nysupct-1803.