E. Watson v. J. Y. Beall

Court of Appeals of Texas

E. Watson v. J. Y. Beall

279 S.W. 546

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedDecember 24, 1925

DocketNo. 296.

StatusPublished

This text of 279 S.W. 546 (E. Watson v. J. Y. Beall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

E. Watson v. J. Y. Beall, 279 S.W. 546 (Tex. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

BAROUS, J.

This is a companion suit to the cause of Annie E. Watson et al. v. William W. Beall, 279 S. W. 543, this day decided by this court. The only difference in the two cases is that J. Y. Beall, who is a brother of William W. Beall, is appellee in this cause, and borrowed from his sister, appellant Mrs. Watson herein, $260 at the same time William W. Beall borrowed the $350, and appellee at the time executed a deed to his sister, Mrs. Watson, to his one-seventh interest in said land, under the same conditions, circumstances, and agreements surrounding the execution of the deed by William W. Beall. The two cases were tried jointly by agreement in the trial court. The statement of facts and the record in both eases are the same, and the judgment is identical, except Mrs. Watson is given judgment against appellee for $428.89, the amount of principal and interest due on the $200 note.

For the reasons given in the opinion in the case of Annie E. Watson et al. v. William W. Beall, the judgment of the trial court in this cause is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BAROUS, J.

This is a companion suit to the cause of Annie E. Watson et al. v. William W. Beall, 279 S. W. 543, this day decided by this court. The only difference in the two cases is that J. Y. Beall, who is a brother of William W. Beall, is appellee in this cause, and borrowed from his sister, appellant Mrs. Watson herein, $260 at the same time William W. Beall borrowed the $350, and appellee at the time executed a deed to his sister, Mrs. Watson, to his one-seventh interest in said land, under the same conditions, circumstances, and agreements surrounding the execution of the deed by William W. Beall. The two cases were tried jointly by agreement in the trial court. The statement of facts and the record in both eases are the same, and the judgment is identical, except Mrs. Watson is given judgment against appellee for $428.89, the amount of principal and interest due on the $200 note.

For the reasons given in the opinion in the case of Annie E. Watson et al. v. William W. Beall, the judgment of the trial court in this cause is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

279 S.W. 546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/e-watson-v-j-y-beall-texapp-1925.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack