E. W. Gates Lumber Co. v. Britton

Mississippi Supreme Court

E. W. Gates Lumber Co. v. Britton

62 So. 648, 105 Miss. 592

Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided March 15, 1913·Published

Opinion

Smith, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

There is no material difference between the deed by which the timber here in controversy was sold and that by which the timber in controversy in Butterfield Lumber Co. v. Guy, 92 Miss. 361, 46 South. 78, 15 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1123, 131 Am. St. Rep. 540, was sold; and consequently the peremptory instruction requested by appellants should have been given.

The judgment of the court below is reversed and judgment here for appellant; costs here and in the court below to be paid by appellee.

Reversed. Judgment for appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

There is no material difference between the deed by which the timber here in controversy was sold and that by which the timber in controversy in Butterfield Lumber Co. v. Guy, 92 Miss. 361, 46 South. 78, 15 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1123, 131 Am. St. Rep. 540, was sold; and consequently the peremptory instruction requested by appellants should have been given.

The judgment of the court below is reversed and judgment here for appellant; costs here and in the court below to be paid by appellee.

Reversed. Judgment for appellant.

E. W. Gates Lumber Co. v. Britton, 62 So. 648, 105 Miss. 592 (Mich. 1913).

Pincite

62 So. 648 (E. W. Gates Lumber Co. v. Britton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related