E. W. Bruno Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

E. W. Bruno Co. v. United States

34 Cust. Ct. 395

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMay 25, 1955

DocketNo. 59108; protests 237514-K, etc. (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 34 Cust. Ct. 395 (E. W. Bruno Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

E. W. Bruno Co. v. United States, 34 Cust. Ct. 395 (cusc 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of travel irons in chief value of metal, containing an electrical element or device as an essential feature thereof, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Greatrex, Limited, and J. J. Gavin & Co., Inc. v. United States (33 Cust. Ct. 79, C. D. 1639), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of travel irons in chief value of metal, containing an electrical element or device as an essential feature thereof, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Greatrex, Limited, and J. J. Gavin & Co., Inc. v. United States (33 Cust. Ct. 79, C. D. 1639), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 Cust. Ct. 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/e-w-bruno-co-v-united-states-cusc-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack