E. W. Bruno Co. v. United States
34 Cust. Ct. 395
United States Customs Court·Decided May 25, 1955·No. No. 59108; protests 237514-K, etc. (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of travel irons in chief value of metal, containing an electrical element or device as an essential feature thereof, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Greatrex, Limited, and J. J. Gavin & Co., Inc. v. United States (33 Cust. Ct. 79, C. D. 1639), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
E. W. Bruno Co. v. United States, 34 Cust. Ct. 395 (cusc 1955).
34 Cust. Ct. 395 (E. W. Bruno Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Greatrex, Ltd. v. United States
33 Cust. Ct. 79 (U.S. Customs Court, 1954)